Healthcare

: Specifications : 1 Page , 1 Source , APA Style: line Describe `capitation` and how it differs from the `fee for operate` method of payment . What poke has it had on providers and managed c ar companies salary For emolument (FFS ) is a finance mechanics in which the persevering pays for the conk out depending on the amount of go provided and the rate the medico has setup . It is the most common gibe of reimbursing the physician . yet , this corpse has a disadvantage . about physicians may spend stripped-down time with for each one enduring br so that they are able consult a greater summate of patients (Drossos 2002Capitation is a method of providing compensation to the physician depending on the health necessarily of the creation . The compensation is obstinate before hand . Depending on age , sex , and fireside status the amount is compute . Physicians would be spending more than time with each patient , as they are non receiving some(prenominal) incentive to consult a greater numerate of patients . As the health status of the each and every genus Phallus of the population is not pre- shaped , the physician would be receiving a miscellaneous saucer , containing some(prenominal) healthy and unhealthy patients (Drossos , 2002Studies take hold shown that both these arrangings have impact providers and managed care funda psychological laws in opposite slipway . In doh the state transformed the factor of providing psychic for about 50 of the population from a FFS system to a capitation system . The direct showed that there were important cause on the manner in which the services were utilized and to a fault on the mental heath status of the population (Manning , 1994Another domain was conducted by Shrank et al (2005 ) to determine the manner in which the statistics changed interest shifty from a FFS to a Capitation financing mechanism in a managed care organization . The study showed that during this shift (that was in 1997 to 1998 , the count of patients seeking cataract working(a) procedure had reduced . However , there was no evidential drop in the number seeking non-cataract surgery .

As cataract is an elective surgery , physicians that are offered better incentives would be playacting more number of much(prenominal) surgeries . However this did not come up in the case of non-elective surgeries , as the physicians were not provided incentives (Shafrin , 2006ReferencesDrossos , A (2002 , wellness Economics Analysis : Fee For Service vs Capitation , Retrieved on July 22 , 2007 , from Alex Drossos .Com sack upsite HYPERLINK hypertext transfer protocol / web .alexdrossos .com /downloads /FFSCapitation .pdf http /www .alexdrossos .com /downloads /FFSCapitation .pdfManning , W (1994 , Capitation vs . fee-for-service for mental health services : the universal time Medicaid experience AHSR FHSR Annu support Abstr rule book , 11 , 108 . HYPERLINK http /gateway .nlm .nih .gov /MeetingAbstracts /1 .html http /gateway .nlm .nih .gov /MeetingAbstracts /1 .htmlShrafin , J (2006 , Fee for service vs . capitation : How financial incentives affect medical service provision , Retrieved on July 22 , 2007 from Healthcare Economist Web site : HYPERLINK http /-economist .com /2006 /12 /04 /fee-for-service-vs-capitatio n-how-financial-incentives-affect-medical-service-provision http /-economist .com /2006 /12 /04 /fee-for-service-vs-capitation -how-financial-incentives-affect-medical-service-provision...If you want to get a ample essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.