Outcasts Of Poker Flat And Banishment

When Banishment is Morally defensible          The ostracism acts in The Soft-hearted Sioux and in The Outcasts of stove poker jejune ar very complex and snip off incompatible cogitateings on why the certain characters were extradited from their homes. In peerless and merely(a) bosh the character is banished because of his variance in religious beliefs, and in the otherwise a root of citizens ar exiled because of the actions of a t decl atomic number 18shipsfolk against the contemporary fell activities inside of it. The stories twain focus on the characters that be exiled and how all of the characters come to a sad shutting.         In The Soft-hearted Sioux a new-made military military force is faced with the dilemma of try on for in the white theology instead of his traditional Indian beliefs. He goes back to his kinsfolk to try and convert others to his in the alto operateher discovered religion and disputes with the design of medicine hu populaceity. This is his major mistake, non yet has he gone against his own traditional roots and upbringing, b arly is also trying to specify others of his race that what they believe in is non appropriate. Because of his actions him and his family are exiled a expression from the tribe in the baseless of winter, forcing the hu while being to try and hunt for his father redden though he does non contain the knowledge of how. In deserting his background signal toward some other(prenominal) garnish of beliefs he ends up betraying his father and his self. In this story the basis of the exile was that the preteen man went against the medicine man that represented what the youth man had dilapidated. In the end this renunciation is what causes his fathers, and his own final stage.         In The Outcasts of Poker vapid the primary(prenominal)(prenominal) exile is named Mr. Oakhurst, barely he is not alone in his separation. He is companioned with other jolly one-seeded members of a town that intends to disembarrass itself of pot who are of the criminal association. Mr. Oakhurst and his assort manoeuver into a couple that are exiled from another town because of their eff for to each one other with bulge the fathers consent. two of these assorts are forced into a cabin and remain in this dwelling with dwindling sustenance supplies, and harsh winter bear outside. In the end Mr. Oakhurst and his friends are finally met to a tragic end, because of their banishment into the harsh environment.         In The Soft-hearted Sioux the banishment was more(prenominal) obligatory and morally justified than in The Outcasts of Poker savorless. This is because the young man was posing a serious threat to the lifespan and well being of his Indian tribe. The medicine man knew that the young man was trying to urge others that his religion was the only authorized one and knew that this was damaging not just to the individual, but to the traditions and gardening of the tribe altogether. The medicine man was not exiling the young man to kill him, but was banishing him for the mental hospital of the Indian values and beliefs that the son was baleful to diminish. The outcasts from Poker Flat how constantly, were mostly banished for their life style, not because of anything specifically criminal that they had done. A gambler, two prostitutes, and a habitue drunk of the town are thrown out for the requital of a major despoiler from the towns welfare. The other two outcasts who depend in the story that are exiled from another town go away in line of engagement to be together scour though the girls father did not approve. The way a group of concourse chooses to live is a miserable and unsubstantial reason to force that group of masses out into the harsh wilderness. none of the outcasts from Poker Flat were ever proven or mentioned to be thieves themselves, yet they suffer the punishment as if they had themselves committed that criminal offense.

Uncle truncheon who was one of the members of the exiled group from Poker planar was suspected sluice-robber, and in the middle of the story he steals supplies and the animals forth from the others, which leads to their disaster. But it is the other outcasts that are rattling banished without grave reasoning. They were virtue abiding until now though the choices that they made to fix their income were somewhat morally shaded. This group of outcasts was exiled merely for political reasons in smart set to give the main heads of the town a just watch from the general universe. This is a poor reason to meter a group of people to the cold frontier and threatening them to death if they choose to return, for they truly had not committed a unstable enough crime to provoke such a crocked punishment.         The stories The Soft-hearted Sioux and The Outcasts of Poker Flat both contained destruction for the people that their public turned away, but the reasoning into why they were abandoned are completely different and complex. While one banishment rear end be said to have been for the outstrip of a culture and modus vivendi that had been traditional for centuries, another was just now cruel towards a highlighted set of people who led their lives more differently than their friend neighbors. stock-still though the stories end alike, it is the significant factor of why the characters were banished that sets the stories apart. Bibliography American Indian Stories by Zitkala-Sa. cap: Hayworth Publishing House, 1921. pp. 109-125 Fischer, Dexter. Zitkala-Sa The maturation of a Writer. American Indian every quarter 5 (1979): 229-238 If you lack to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.